European Union Portugal 2020 - Agriculture and Rural Development Foundation for Science and Technology European University Foundation
Suggestions, Compliments, Complaints Terms & Conditions of Use Projects Co-financed by the European Union
©2026 Universidade Politécnica de Coimbra. Todos os direitos reservados.

Search

Executive Procedure Law

Home / Oferta Formativa / Coimbra Business School / Master / Master in Solicitadory

Base Knowledge

CB1. Knowledge of civil procedural law.

CB2. Knowledge of enforcement proceedings.

Teaching Methodologies

ME1. Interactive Lectures: Theoretical sessions focused on the structured transmission of key concepts.

ME2. Learning based on the critical analysis and discussion of selected texts that exemplify the concepts, methods, techniques, and procedures presented.

ME3. Tutorial Guidance (OT): Continuous feedback sessions in small groups to monitor the resolution and discussion of case studies and to clarify questions.

Learning Results

Upon completion of this course unit, the student will be able to:

OA1. Interpret and critically analyze legal provisions concerning matters related to enforcement proceedings.

OA2. Develop a well-founded position on a topic within the law of enforcement proceedings.

Associated competencies:

CD1. Critical Thinking: Ability to critically analyze various doctrinal and jurisprudential positions regarding matters related to enforcement proceedings.

CD2. Communication: Demonstrate oral presentation and argumentation skills regarding a topic within the law of enforcement proceedings.

Program

P1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Concept and purposes of enforcement
1.2. Assumptions of executive action
1.3. The Enforcement
1.4. Sure, enforceability and liquidity requirement
1.5. Jurisdiction of the court
1.6. Legitimacy of the parties
1.7. Sponsorship judiciary
1.8. Multiple subjects and multiple requests
1.9. Forms of the executive process

P2. PEPEX – Procedimento extrajudicial pré-executivo (Pre-executive extrajudicial procedure)

2.1. Pepex

2.2. Regime

P3. JOINT IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS FOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN AMOUNT
3.1. Delimitation
3.2. Initial phase
3.3. Opposition to the implementation
3.4. Object of the garnishment
3.5. The phase of attachment
3.6. Function and effects of attachment
3.7. Opposition to attachment
3.8. Notice and tender
3.9. Sales Executive
3.10. Payment
3.11. Termination and cancellation of execution

P4. OTHER PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION
4.1. Enforcement procedure common for delivery of a certain
4.2. Process execution common to provide that
4.3. Processes special executive

Curricular Unit Teachers

Rita Gonçalves Ferreira da Silva

Grading Methods

A) CONTINUOUS/PERIODIC ASSESSMENT:

MA1. Individual Written Test (40%): Reference to unannotated legislation allowed. Minimum grade of 8.5. Mandatory component.

MA2. Individual Assignment (40%): Assignment on a topic regarding Enforcement Procedural Law, between 15 and 25 pages in length (the page count excludes the cover and back cover, table of contents, bibliography, list of abbreviations, and any appendices). Minimum grade of 9.5.

IAG Guideline: Level 0 (No AI usage).

MA3. Individual Oral Presentation and Defense (20%): Individual presentation of the assignment and responses to questions from the instructor and classmates. Minimum grade of 9.5. Mandatory for the defense of the assignment grade (MA2).

IAG Guideline: Level 0 (No AI usage).

Final Grade Formula: FG = 0.40 x MA1 + 0.4 x MA2 + 0.2 x MA3

B) EXAM-BASED ASSESSMENT (Resit/Special Exam Periods):

MA4. Individual Written Exam (100%): Minimum grade of 9.5.

In the event of a well-founded suspicion of fraud detected during the exam grading phase, the student will be summoned to take an oral exam to verify the knowledge and skills demonstrated. This verification is conducted by a panel consisting of the course instructor and two other professors from the same field. If the student fails to demonstrate the knowledge and skills shown in the written exam, the exam will be annulled.


    Internship(s)

    NAO

    Bibliography

    Main bibliography:

    – Lebre de Freitas, José (2017). A Ação Executiva, À Luz do Código de Processo Civil de 2013 (7ª Edição). Gestlegal.

    Complementary bibliography:

    – Carvalho Gonçalves, Marco (2023). Lições de Processo Civil Executivo (5ª Edição). Almedina.

    – Carvalho, José Henrique (2016). Ação Executiva para Pagamento de Quantia Certa. Quid Juris.

    – Costa Ribeiro, Virgínio (2011). As Funções do Agente de Execução. Almedina.

    – Gonçalves Pinto, Rui (2013). Manual da Execução e Despejo. Coimbra Editora.

    – Gonçalves Pinto, Rui (2023). A ação executiva. AAFDL.

    – Mineiro, Pedro Edgar (2016). Competências do juiz e do agente de execução na ação executiva para pagamento de quantia certa. Almedina.

    – Paiva, Eduardo, Cabrita, Helena (2013). O processo executivo e o agente de execução. Coimbra Editora.

    – Remédio Marques, J. P. (2000). Curso de Processo Executivo Comum à Face do Código Revisto. Almedina.

    – Serra, Miguel Dinis (2015). El Ejercicio de la Abogacía en Portugal y España- Estudio Comparativo. Coimbra Editora.

    – Teixeira de Sousa, Miguel (1998). Acção Executiva Singular. Lex.