Base Knowledge
not applicable
Teaching Methodologies
The methodological choices conducive to the fulfillment of the program of the course will focus on two key educational components:
– Theoretical component – oral presentation oriented to the estimated contents;
– Study visits.
Learning Results
– Understand the importance of artistic phenomena pursuant the evolution of arts, design and society.
– Recognize the specificities of a work or artistic expression, providing relevant links that relate them to other artistic expressions or domains.
– Promote culture in the student through exhibition of works that constitute historical landmarks in different periods and movements in the history of art and design.
– Emphasize the importance of artistic language for the comprehension of other curricular approaches, allowing students a better perception of the purpose of their studies.
Program
History of Art
-The art of the ancient world
– The International Gothic Style
– The Italian and North European Renaissance
– Romanticism and Realism
– The Age of Impressionism
– From Fauvism to Dadaist nonsense
– Conceptual Art
– Happening and Performance
– The relationship between Art, Science and Technology
– Interaction in virtual space
– Post-Human, Post-Structuralism, Postmodernism and Altermodernism
History of Design
Art, Crafts and Mechanization
– Aesthetic movements and design reform
– The role and influence of Morris and Ruskin
– Mechanization and industry
Industry after World War I
– The Ulm School and the Bauhaus
– Art, Design and Industry
Modernism
– International Modernism
– Mass culture and consumption
Progress and democratization
– New materials and products
– Politics and postmodernism
-Design, culture and globalization
Grading Methods
The evaluation on the curricular unit will take place, at the option of the student, of the following ways:
- Continuous evaluation;
- Exam.
The evaluation in these modalities will obey to explicit criteria in the statements and/or other elements presented, according to the following modalities and weights in the global evaluation:
Continuous evaluation:
Intermediate test or written assignment: 30%
Final test: 60%
Class participation: 10%
Exam:
Test - 100%
Internship(s)
NAO
Bibliography
Argan, G. (1992). Modern Art. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Bernard, M. (1998). Art, design and visual culture. London: McMilan Press Ltd.
Bourriaud, N. (2001). Relational aesthetics. Paris: Presses du Réel.
Goldberg, R. (2012). The art of performance – from Futurism to the Present. Lisboa: Orfeu Negro. Harris, P.; Ambrose, G. (2011). Design Thinking. Lisboa: Bookman
Janson, H. (1998). History of Art, Lisboa: F.C. Gulbenkian FC.
Larsen, L. (et al.) (1999). Art at the turn of the millennium. Colónia: Taschen.
Lieser, W. (2010). Digital Art. Potsdam: h.f.ullman.
Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs – An Introduction To Design For Social Innovation. Cambridge MA: MIT PRESS LTD.
Norman, D. (2005) Emotional Design. New York: Basic Books.
Pradel, J-L. (2002). Contemporary Art. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Tribe, M; JANA, R. (2010). New Media Art. Köln: Taschen.