Action Research Methods

Base Knowledge

N/A

Teaching Methodologies

Classes are dynamic in nature, integrating: 1) a combination of systematic presentations of information and knowledge with critical analysis, based on texts and practical exercises; 2) practical data analysis work, supported by specific software. Students may choose between continuous assessment or assessment by examination. Continuous assessment includes: An action research project (individual) 65%; 5 mini tests throughout the semester 25% and knowledge application tasks 10%

Assessment by examination includes a written test on all the contents of the course unit (100%).

Learning Results

1. To know, master and apply the procedures and methodologies of qualitative/ quantitative research and of action research at several intervention contexts within social pedagogy:
• To identify research problems and design an action research project;
• To select the most appropriate research design;
• To select the universe and the sample;
• To select, use and/ or design appropriate quantitative/ qualitative data collection techniques;
• To analyze quantitative / qualitative data, using specialized software;
• To interpret the collected information and communicate research results to different audiences;
• To solve problems and introduce into daily practice both the results of its own reflexive research practice, and the results of scientific studies and research;
2. To develop a critical awareness of research results conducted either by other researchers, either by his/ her own.

Program

1. Epistemological, ethical and political principles of action research

– The pluridiversity of knowledge and the false dichotomy between rigour and objectivity

– The place of enunciation and its consequences in the practice of MIA.

– Social and political relevance of an IAP: Paulo Freire’s tripod: thinking about the world; analysing the world; acting in the world

2. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methodologies

– A participatory action research methodology: what does it involve? What is the difference between doing for and doing with

– Research characteristics and instruments: interview and questionnaire surveys; observation and participant observation; document analysis; grey literature analysis; literature review

3. Qualitative methodologies and their different types

– Case studies

– Oral history

– Life stories

– Ethnography and auto-ethnography

– Comparative studies

4. Techniques for processing and analysing the knowledge gathered

– Categorical systematisation and construction of a categorisation grid

– Literature review

– Content analysis

– Statistical analysis

5. IAP research protocol

– What is it for

– Designing the structure of an IAP protocol

Curricular Unit Teachers

António Guilherme da Cruz Duarte Leal

Grading Methods

Continuous Evaluation:

Action research project (individual) - 65%;

5 mini tests - 25%

knowledge application tasks 10%

Exam:

Exam - 100%


    Internship(s)

    NAO

    Bibliography

    American Psychological Association (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7.th ed.). APA
    Bardin, L. (2009). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 7

    Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press

    Creswell, J. (2008). Educational research. Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson

    Creswell, J., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage

    Fals Borda, Orlando. (2015). Una Sociología sentipensante para la América Latina. México: Sigilo XXI Editores; Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Freire, Paulo (1974), Uma educação para a liberdade. Porto: textos marginais.

    Guerrero Arias, Patricio (2020), Corazonar. Una antropología comprometida con la vida. Miradas otras desde Abya-Yala para la descolonización del poder, del saber y del ser. Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.

    Harding, Sandra (1998), ¿Es la ciencia multicultural?: poscolonialismos, feminismos y epistemologías. Bloomington e Indianápolis: Indiana University Press.

    Haraway, Donna (2020), Seguir con el problema. Generando parentesco en Chthuluceno. Bilbao: Edición consonni.

    Hill, M., & Hill, A. (2009). Investigação por questionário. Report Number

    Laureano, R. ( 2013). Teste de hipóteses com o SPSS. Edições Sílabo

    Laureano, R., & Botelho, M. (2012). SPSS. O meu manual de consulta rápida. Edições Sílabo

    Minayo, M., & Costa, A. (2019). Techniques that use speech, observation and empathy. Qualitative research in action. Ludomedia

    Morgado, J. (2012). O estudo de caso na investigação em educação. De Facto Editores

    Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research. Sage