Bioethics and Deontology

Base Knowledge

Not applied.

Teaching Methodologies

Expository method with appeal to the analysis and critical reflection on the contents agreed in interaction in the classroom.

-Continuous Assessment: relevant Interventions in the analysis introduced in class as a response to the problems in context from the quotidian (10% of the total of evaluation).

– Summative assessment: Moment of issuing a reasoned opinion on the covered topics.

It is intended the student’s involvement, the alert to the current themes, weighting and consolidating critical reflection on the actions arising from the decision-making process.

Learning Results

The student must acquire knowledge to:
• Recognize the main concepts and ethical and moral theories that fall into decision-making.
• Relate their Praxis with the legal framework and the consequent impact on job performance.
• Identify, contact and treat the patient, with dignity and respect.
The student must acquire skills for:
• Establish an empathetic relationship with the patient towards the collective good.
• Apply approaches to anti-discrimination and take into consideration the physical, psychological, social,
cultural and religious needs.
The student must acquire competences for:
• Join patent ducts on deontological codes.
• Take responsibility underlying the study and treatment of the patient.
• Obtain informed consent and clarified for any examination/treatment.
• Show a good character and professionally integrate good professional standards in private life.
• Manage ethically reflecting human and material resources.

Program

– The subject of Ethics, structure and terms origin; The natural foundations of social conventions and Ethics.

– Norms, rules and laws. Ethics as need for guidance of conduct; Tolerance and Cultural Diversity.

– The Neurosciences. Consciousness. The objection of Conscience in professional performance.

– Ethics and Society; Professional Attitude and Deontological Ethics.

– The rights and duties of the patient; the responsibility of technicians.

– Informed and clarified consent; Ethical guidelines in scientific research.

– The application of new technologies to human life

– Euthanasia. Therapeutic Obstinacy. Refusal to provide in corpses.

– The desacralization of the body. The ethics committees. Laboratory Experimentation.

– Issue of opinion in relation to the diagnosis. The obligation of professional secrecy. The right to the diagnostic image.

– The invasion of privacy. Bioethics and Teleradiology (responsibility, security, consent, etc.). 

Curricular Unit Teachers

Graciano do Nascimento Nobre Paulo

Internship(s)

NAO

Bibliography

Bibliografia Primária – Archer, Biscaia e Osswald (Coord.). “Bioética”. Lisboa, Verbo, 1999.

Beauchamps T. & Chidress J. “Principles of Biomedical Ethics”.7th ed. Oxford, 2012.

Bernard J. “A Bioética”. Biblioteca de Ciência e Cultura. Lisboa, Instituto Piaget,1993.

Changeaux J-P. (Dir.). “Fundamentos naturais da ética”. Pensamento e Filosofia. Lisboa, Instituto Piaget,1996.

Coleman CH., Bouësseau M-C., Reis A. “The contribution of ethics to public health”. OMS, 2008.

Gafo J. “10 Palavras-chave em Bioética”. Coimbra, Gráfica de Coimbra, 1996.

Gert B., Culver C. & Clouser K.”Bioethics: A Systematic Approach”. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, 2006.

Jonsen, Siegler & Winslade. “Ética Clínica”. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1998.

Lourenço O. “Psicologia do desenvolvimento moral”. Coimbra, Livraria Almedina,3aE d., 2006.

Osswald W. e Patrão Neves MC. “Bioética Simples”. Lisboa, Verbo, 2007.

Sève L. “Para uma crítica da razão bioética”. Epistemologia e Sociedade. Lisboa, Instituto Piaget, 1997.

 

Bibliografia Secundária – Post S. “Encyclopedia of Bioethics”. 3rd ed. Macmillan. USA, 2004.

Challenger, M. “Ser Animal Ser Humano”. Lisboa, Temas e Debates, 2021.

Patrão Neves, MC. e Soromenho-Marques, V. “Ética Aplicada: Ambiente”. Lisboa, Edições 70, 2017.