Base Knowledge
Philosophy at the secondary level.
Teaching Methodologies
Methods (from a constructivist perspective) of teaching include:
– Exhibition and debates.
– Game based learning – using serious games developed for this UC and enhancing students’ commitment, curiosity and interest in the content and analysis, as well as a critical sense.
– Group and individual work and reflections.
– Presentations of papers and defences of arguments – public or written.
– Query / search for documents.
In all these tools, the student is at the centre of the teaching/learning process, essentially resorting to active methodologies.
Learning Results
- recognize and understand the ethical dimension of engineering and electrical engineering action
- know and understand ethical values
- to know the ethical and deontological principles that are defined in the professional codes of ethics in the area of Engineering
- understand the potential scope of the consequences (positive and negative) of the engineering action (including the social, economic and environmental dimension) – macro-ethics
- knowing how to critically and ethically analyze practical situations (level of deontology/micro-ethics applied to engineering) – macro-ethics
- knowing how to argue and base decision-making based on professional ethics/deontology (level of deontology/micro-ethics applied to engineering)
- know the principles of ethics for sustainability
Program
- Introduction: concepts of ethics, morals, deontology, values, micro-ethics and macro-ethics
- The professional practice of electrical engineering
- Ethical and deontological principles that are defined in the Professional Codes of Ethics in the area of Engineering (practical analysis):
- Engineering as a profession of public trust
- Responsibility in the professional practice of engineering
- Guidance and implementation in the professional practice of engineering
- The Engineer’s Duties to the Community
- The engineer’s duties to the employer and the customer
- The duties of the engineer in the exercise of the profession
- Engineers’ Reciprocal Duties
- The ethical values necessary for the professional practice of engineering.
- How to make a critical and ethical analysis: practical examples in terms of deontology/micro-ethics
- How to structure an ethical foundation: practical examples in terms of deontology/micro-ethics
- Consequences (positive and negative) of engineering action (including the social, economic and environmental dimension) – macro-ethics
- The ethical limits of science and technology
- Ethics for sustainability / ethics of responsibility by Hans Jonas.
Curricular Unit Teachers
Maria de Fátima Coelho MonteiroGrading Methods
Assessment is carried out continuously throughout the semester.
It focuses on commitment and participation throughout the classes and activities (20%), the evaluation of the work done throughout the UC (written and oral work) (60%) and a moment of written evaluation (20%).
Students who fail the continuous assessment can go to the final exam (at any time).
Student workers who cannot attend the UC can take this UC exclusively through a final exam (at any time).
Internship(s)
NAO
Bibliography
Rego, A. & Braga, J. (2017). Ética para engenheiros: desafiando a síndrome do vaivém Challenger. Lidel
Cota da Bibliotheca do ISEC:2-4-759 e 2-4-827
Stephen, J., Gostelow, J. P. & King, W. (2000). Engineering and society: challenges of professional practice. Prentice Hall
Cota da Bibliotheca do ISEC: 2-4-305
Código Deontológico e Ético da Ordem dos Engenheiros – disponível online
Código Deontológico da Ordem dos Engenheiros Técnicos – disponível online