Auditory rehabilitation

Base Knowledge

The student should have knowledge of different technical aids and listening support systems, the pathology of the audio-vestibular system, as well as the psychology of interpersonal relationships.

Teaching Methodologies

– Continuous assessment.
– T/P matrix will be evaluated based on a written evaluation with 75% ponderation and a group work with 25%
podenration. A miminum of 8 values is mandatory on the written evaluation.
– TheT / P component corresponde to 70% of the final grade.
– Practical assessment,on two occasions, will contribute in 30% of the final grade.
– To performed the pratical examination students must obtain a minimum of 9.5 values.

Learning Results

Acquire auditory rehabilitation intervention methodologies in interdisciplinary teams.

Program

Definition of rehabilitation /aural rehabilitation (AR) -2h
Importance of AR; Deprivation, early stimulation, brain plasticity; Types of AR; Limitations of AR -2h
Psychological and educational factors and the motivation -2h
Impact of hearing impairment; Scales of hearing handicap -4h
Ethical and economic factors -2h
Audiological evaluation; Analysis of expectation -2h
Cost /benefit ratio and its application to difentes types of technical aids -2h
Tips for better use /maintenance of assistive devices; Importance of tracking; Applying satisfaction scales -4h
AR in children and its audiological evaluation; The contribution of Audiologists in interdisciplinary; Assistive
listening systems in the classroom; Integration of children with hearing disabilities in education -4h
Different levels and types of deafness and the challenges in rehabilitation -2h
Presentation of group work -2h
Knowledge assessment -2h
Matrix practice: students will be divided into 4 groups, a total of 120h.

Curricular Unit Teachers

Internship(s)

NAO

Bibliography

CLARK, G et al. 1997. Cochlear implantation for infants and children. San Diego
HULL, R 2001. Aural Rehabilitation Serving Children and Adults. 4ª Ed, San Diego
KATZ, J 2009. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 6ª Ed, Philadelphia
MUELLER, H et al. 1992. Probe Microphone Measurements, Hearing Aid selection and assessment. San Diego

POLLACK, M 1980. Amplification for the Hearing Impaired. 2ª Ed, New York
RODRIGUEZ, M 2002. Implantes Cocleares. Barcelona, Masson
SANDLIN, R 2000. Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification. San Diego
SCHNUPP, J et al. 2011. Auditory neuroscience: making sense of sound. 1º Ed, Cambridges
TYE-MURRAY, N 2009. Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation, Chilbren, Adults and Their Family Members. San Diego
VALENTE, M 2002. Hearing aids: Standards, Options And Limitations. New York
VALENTE, M et al, 2000, Audiology Treatment, New York