Mobility Planning

Base Knowledge

It is recommended that students have prior knowledge of statistics and geographic information systems

Teaching Methodologies

Classes are focused on the presentation and discussion of the different subjects that make up the program of the discipline, encouraging active and participatory learning. The expository method will be used to promote the mastery of fundamental concepts and principles of mobility planning. In addition to the expository method, the interrogative method will also be used to increase the spirit of reflection. In this context, the answers should be found by the class. Furthermore, the demonstrative method will play a relevant role in motivating students to carry out tasks. The resolution of practical problems will be broken down into elementary operations. In the phases following the application of the demonstrative method, the active method will be applied through the formulation of practical problems that can be solved by all students.

Learning Results

Provide a global and integrated view of the opportunities and problems arising from the significant transformation that has taken place in terms of mobility. Promote awareness and critical reflection of students on the importance of mobility planning, as well as the various existing policies and instruments (at different scales) in this field of action

Program

I – Importance of Mobility Planning. Clarification of concepts. II – Mobility and transport systems. III – Mobility and accessibility assessment models. IV – Mobility and territorial planning. V – Policies and instruments in the areas of mobility and accessibility from a European scale to a local scale. VI – Discussion of case studies.

Curricular Unit Teachers

Grading Methods

Final evaluation
  • - Exam - 100.0%

Internship(s)

NAO

Bibliography

Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm.Transport policy,15(2), 73-80.

Calderón, F.,&Miller, E. J. (2020). A literature review of mobility services: definitions, modelling state-of-the-art, and key considerations for a conceptual modelling framework.Transport Reviews,40(3), 312-332.

Dhanani, A., Tarkhanyan, L.,&Vaughan, L. (2017). Estimating pedestrian demand for active transport evaluation and planning.Transportation research part A: policy and practice,103, 54-69.

Geurs, K. T.,&Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions.Journal of Transport Geography,12(2), 127-140.

Levine, J. (2020). A century of evolution of the accessibility concept.Transportation research part D: transport and environment,83, 102309.

Governo de Portugal (2014) Plano Estratégico dos Transportes e Infraestruturas. Documento Técnico, 121p.

Hörcher, D.,&Tirachini, A. (2021). A review of public transport economics.Economics of transportation,25,100196.

Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes Terrestres. (2011).Rede Ciclável – Princípios de Planeamento e Desenho.Lisboa: Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes Terrestres
 
Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes Terrestres. (2011).Rede Pedonal – Princípios de Planeamento e Desenho.Lisboa: Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes Terrestres
 
Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes Terrestres. (2011).Transportes Partilhados.Lisboa: Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes Terrestres
 
Stussi, R., Babo, A.,&Ribeiro, S. (2011). Acessibilidade, mobilidade e logística urbana. Lisboa, DGOT-DU,Série Política de Cidades,(6).
 
Van Heerden, Q., Karsten, C., Holloway, J., Petzer, E., Burger, P.,&Mans, G. (2022). Accessibility, affordability, and equity in long-term spatial planning: Perspectives from a developing country.Transport Policy,120, 104-119.